Canadian Shipper


Feds will defend supply management in NAFTA talks: MacAulay

Ottawa, ON — Canada is ready to modernize the North American Free Trade Agreement, but supply management will be protected, Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAulay said Monday.

“We’re quite ready to defend a system that works so well for this country, so well for the dairy farms, so well for consumers and (is) a model for the world, I might add,” MacAulay said as he left a meeting with Canadian farmers.

MacAulay met representatives from the agricultural industry — including wine, dairy, pork and beef — during the third round of talks with the U.S. and Mexico to replace the 23-year-old trade deal.

The minister said his defence of the supply management system that protects Canadian dairy, eggs and poultry does not mean there is nothing about the trade deal that needs changing.

“We’re fully aware the United States is the most important market we have — greatly important for the agriculture sector, but it’s also important to note that we are the most important market for a lot of states in the United States,” MacAulay said.

“So, we realize we’re dealing with friends,” he said. “The U.S. realizes we are their friends, but there’s things to iron out and hopefully it will iron out in a very positive way and even make the deal better.”

Some of the thornier issues expected to come up in the NAFTA talks involve the Canadian agricultural industry, especially since the U.S. wants greater access for its dairy products.

On Sunday, Canada’s chief negotiator said he did not expect to see any details from the U.S. on its desire to end the supply management system for dairy and poultry this time around.

The dairy sector was excluded from the original NAFTA deal in 1994, but the supply management system, which limits the amount of dairy that can be imported into Canada without high tariffs, has long been a point of contention.

A more recent dairy-related issue that also came up was a deal reached by the 12,000 dairy producers in Canada to sell milk proteins to domestic processors at a discount in order to further protect the industry from imports of cheap U.S. milk ingredients.

Jacques Lefebvre, president and CEO of the Dairy Processors Association of Canada, said his organization has told the Liberal government they do not think the sector should be part of the renegotiation of NAFTA at all.

“If the government can make a good case as to why it should be, then we need to ensure that any concessions to the sector, to the dairy market in Canada, is met with an equal net benefit to the sector,” said Lefebvre, who was at the meeting with MacAulay.

“Don’t use dairy as a bargaining chip for other sectors,” he said.

As the meeting opened, the Liberal government said it is committed to boosting food exports to $75 billion by 2025.

“It means that around this table and many other tables we have to work and make sure that all our sectors are on the cutting edge and we’re able to produce the products that the world needs,” MacAulay said.

“Simply, they’re going to get it somewhere,” he said.

“We want them to get a good shot of it from the people sitting around this table and the people that you represent.”

Conservative MP Erin O’Toole, the foreign affairs critic for his party, said he would like to see the Liberal government be more specific about how it plans to protect supply management.

He acknowledged Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland mentioned it her speech outlining her broad NAFTA objectives last month, but would like to know more.

“We’ve since not seen the government … set the table ahead of negotiations to show how that industry and the thousands of families that rely on it must be safeguarded in negotiations,” O’Toole told a news conference Monday.

“The Mulroney government achieved a fantastic success with U.S. free trade and then NAFTA, while respecting our unique system of supply management,” he said.

O’Toole said he would also like to see the Liberal government be clear in its goals for other areas too — especially when it comes to protecting and creating jobs in the auto, softwood lumber and resource sectors.

“There’s almost a million jobs indirectly related to trade in just those three areas alone, so we see an absence of time spent, an absence of emphasis by the government,” said O’Toole.


Print this page

Related Posts

Have your say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *